Certificate of Competence in
AI-Native Development
is hereby granted to
Elaine Marley
A vendor and framework neutral certification for software professionals who can design, build, and deliver production-ready software with AI.
The lowest price it will ever be.
Certificate of Competence in
AI-Native Development
is hereby granted to
Elaine Marley
Be one of the first AI-certified developers in the industry.
10,000+ developers and 680+ companies already certify with certificates.dev




















This is the credential that proves you can...
Orchestrate AI agents like an engineering team. Give them direction, set the constraints, and know when to take the wheel.
Move at AI speed without sacrificing engineering quality. Turn AI output into production-grade software through rigorous review and refinement.
Build the architecture AI works inside. Define the boundaries, interfaces, and constraints that keep complex systems coherent.
Make the critical decisions, validate the result, and take responsibility for what reaches production.
Build with AI without compromising security. Threat-model the system, challenge risky output, and engineer for safety from the start.
The hardest problems still come down to your reasoning. Debug the unknown, weigh the tradeoffs, and find the path forward.
Turn what you can do with AI into leverage for promotions, job offers, and higher pay.
Step01
A path that builds from foundations to advanced practice, and that depth is what stands behind the credential.
Foundations
The working mental model of how a language model turns your input into code, without the mathematics. You cannot reliably direct what you do not understand.
Language models as code generators
Training, inference, and knowledge
The context window
Reasoning models versus standard models
Determinism and variability
The professional’s calibrated sense of what AI can be trusted with, and where it reliably fails. The founding principle: AI output is an artifact to verify, not an authority to trust.
Hallucination
Characteristic failures in code
Where AI excels and where it struggles
Reading the evidence honestly
The map of the tools by category, and how to choose the right one for the job rather than the loudest one.
Modes of assistance
The autonomy ladder
Choosing a model for a task
Deployment and data posture
The first practical skill, getting from what you mean to reliable output. Foundational, but a floor, not a ceiling; it becomes context engineering next.
Anatomy of an effective coding instruction
Context and examples
Planning prompts
Reasoning models versus standard models
Iteration and anti-patterns
Practitioner
The deliberate construction of what the model sees, the discipline that ultimately bounds output quality. By developer demand, among the most important competencies in the field.
The context window as a budget
Curation
Retrieval and codebase context
Rules, instructions, and memory
Connecting external context (MCP)
Session management
Moving the work upstream. When generation is cheap, knowing precisely what to build is where the leverage and the errors concentrate, and what makes agent output reliable rather than merely plausible.
Requirements with AI
Acceptance criteria
Specification-driven development
Why specs matter more with agents
Using AI in design while remaining the accountable decision-maker, and shaping the codebase so AI can work in it safely. Where AI helps least autonomously and the stakes are highest.
AI as a design partner
Decisions and accountability
Coherence at scale
AI-legible codebases
Legacy modernization
The disciplined daily practice of building with AI as a collaborator rather than a code vending machine. The most-used competency, and the one that separates reliable engineers from vibe coders.
The build loop
Codebase comprehension
Making changes
Mode selection in practice
Vibe coding, in its place
Advanced
Directing autonomous and multi-agent workflows, where the largest gains and the largest risks both live. The defining advanced competency.
What makes a tool agentic
Directing a single agent
Guardrails and permissions
Tool use
MCP for agents
Multi-agent and parallel work
Customizing your agent
Reliability and cost
Proving AI-built software is correct, the counterweight to cheap generation, and the domain where the lesson that passing tests is not correctness lands.
Generating tests with AI
Test quality
The verification stack
Evaluating AI output and agents
Finding and fixing defects with AI through evidence rather than guesswork, including defects in code you did not write yourself.
Evidence-based debugging
Root cause
Production and systems
Reviewing AI-generated code critically and holding quality, the durable human edge. In an AI-assisted team the pull request becomes the human verification boundary.
Reviewing AI code
Trust calibration
Standards and debt
Judgment and ownership
The two security problems AI introduces, unsafe code it generates and attacks on the AI system itself. A horizontal concern that touches every other domain, treated here in depth.
Security of AI-generated code
Prompt injection
The AI supply chain
Secrets and data
Securing agents
Completing the lifecycle, taking AI-built software through delivery and operations, with autonomy that tightens as actions become irreversible.
Delivery
Git and collaboration
Documentation
Operations
Scaling AI development from the individual to the team and the organization, and situating your own evolving role. Individual fluency does not automatically become organizational capability.
Shared practice
Governance
Measuring impact
The professional’s role
Step02
Extra training if you want it. Take it at your own pace with self-study, or join the Live Bootcamp led by Alex Garrett-Smith.
Step03
135 minutes of questions and pure execution, scored across six domains of judgment, the final call always human. Take it whenever you are ready, the voucher is valid three years.
The exam is real work you direct. Here is one question from it.
Deep into a long agent session, its code turns sloppy and it forgets constraints you set earlier, and you are nowhere near the context limit. What is actually going wrong?
That was a multiple-choice question, one part of the exam. The other part is hands-on work in real code, the way it happens on the job.
Every move, across all six domains, end to end.
It doesn't reward memorization. It rewards the calls you make on real code.
Alex KyriakidisFounder and CEO of BitterBrainsSits on every certification examination board
Evan YouCreator of Vue.jsSigns every Vue certificate
Aurora ScharffReact Expert, Microsoft MVPShaped the React cert, lead instructor and board member
Alex Garrett-SmithTechnical Education Lead, BitterBrainsExamination Board Lead · certificates.dev
Alain ChautardGoogle Developer Expert in Web TechnologiesLeads the team building the Angular exam
Sébastien ChopinCreator of NuxtDevelops the Nuxt track
Mostafa SaidDirector of Education, BitterBrainsContributes across every certification
Daniel KellyLead Vue School InstructorExamination board member
Eduardo San Martin MoroteVue core team, creator of Pinia and Vue RouterReviews the Vue certification
Steve McDougallLaravel and API consultant, PHP-FIG committeeAuthored the Laravel certification
Matteo CollinaNode.js TSC member, CTO at PlatformaticJavaScript examination board member
Martin FerretFull-stack JavaScript senior developerJavaScript examination lead
Daniel RoeNuxt core team lead
Reza BaarFull-stack software engineerNuxt examination lead
Cory HousePrincipal at reactjsconsulting.comEndorses the React certification
Devlin DuldulaoReact Expert, creator of DaloyJSExamination board member
Abdelrahman AwadGoogle Developer Expert in Web TechnologiesExamination board member
Jad JoubranGoogle Developer Expert, JavaScript and web performanceContributes to the JavaScript certification
Haimantika MitraDeveloper Advocate at DigitalOcean, ex MicrosoftJavaScript board advisor
Nathan WalkerDeveloper Expert for NativeScriptJavaScript board advisor
Igor RandjelovicCreator of nativescript-vue
Yannick KupferschmidtTeam Lead PHP at byte5Laravel practitioner-reviewer
Roberto GalleaPhD Computer Science, University of PalermoLaravel practitioner-reviewer
Niek KeijzerLaravel developer at Goedemiddag!Laravel practitioner-reviewer
Oleksii KovbasaDevelopment team lead at Red ChameleonLaravel practitioner-reviewerWe certify experts in







Not just a credential. It's where you find out where you really stand, push past it, and see what you can do with this kind of power. The proof is what you leave with.
50% off
The credential on its own, for people who will prep their own way.
Recommended
45% off
The exam plus the training built for it. The plan most people should pick.
37% off
Everything in the middle plan, plus the Live Bootcamp.
Preorder today and get these founding benefits.
The prep guide and self-paced platform reach you before general release.
Early access to the exam, and your name among the first to hold it.
Founding pricing, and it only climbs from here as seats fill.
A live onboarding session and open Q&A with Alex G, for preorder buyers.
Your preorder helps fund building the certification itself.
100% secure checkout via Chargebee
For teams. Add seats directly on any pricing card above, the price adjusts as your team grows. For custom needs, a larger rollout, or procurement requirements a toggle can't handle, reach out and we'll work it out with you directly.
Buying for yourself but need sign-off? We already wrote the note for your manager, send it as is or edit it first.
"Even as a seasoned developer with more than 10 years experience, I've learned a bunch that I didn't know and it deepened my understanding of the technology I became certified for."
"The exam content was well-structured and closely aligned with real-world React development scenarios, which made it feel practical and valuable rather than just theoretical."
"The clear progression helps developers understand what they should master at each stage and provides a way to demonstrate that expertise to employers."
"Having an external entity evaluate your knowledge is valuable, as it helps you confirm whether you truly understand the concepts beyond your own perception."
"The curriculum description was accurate, the website worked fine and the proctoring system adds a level of trust to the certification."
"I highly recommend this certification for individual developers and companies. It serves as a great way to formalize a knowledge base within organizations and effectively evaluate developers' expertise."
It's a supervised examination with ID and biometric check-in, 135 minutes of questions and pure execution, in a live sandboxed codebase, scored collaboratively by AI examiners and human experts, with the final call on every result belonging to the human.
There's no question bank to leak, because every sitting generates fresh. The one thing you can't do here is pass on recognition alone.
A hands-on AI certification for software developers. You direct an AI agent through a live codebase, and every prompt you write is part of your answer.
It measures the judgment you wrap around AI, what you send it in to do, what you accept, and what you push back on, in whatever stack you already work in. It isn't proof you can use the tools, it's proof you can direct them.
No. Competence is the gate, not tenure. The exam proves judgment at whatever level you're exercising it, and the people on our waitlist span the full range of experience almost evenly.
You're required to. Directing it well is the entire thing being examined.
It's the division of labor on your certificate, said plainly.
Three AI examiners read every answer independently, from different model families, at a depth no human panel could afford. A board of working developers holds the final signature, and a human expert reviews every fail before it's issued.
The machines bring the scale, the people put their names on the result, and neither alone would be worth printing on paper.
Not a number. A six-domain profile with receipts, every scored claim linked to the exact transcript moment it came from, including where you caught the planted issue and where you missed one. A calibration index shows whether your confidence matched your accuracy.
There's also a hiring-manager view of the same scores, written as plain trust statements like "can be trusted to review agent-written changes before they reach production", built to be read in thirty seconds by someone who wasn't in the room.
A fail gets the same document, which makes it a retake study plan rather than a rejection letter.
The issuer is the recognition.
The AI certification adds a score report an employer can actually read, plain trust statements with the evidence linked underneath.
Three ways in. The exam on its own, the exam plus the self-paced training built for it, or that plus the three-week Live Bootcamp.
Exam only is the credential and the prep to pass it, the exam, the prep guide, and the Discord. Exam plus Preparation adds the training platform, a free retake, and an unlimited trial exam, and it's the plan most people should pick. The full program adds the Live Bootcamp with Alex G on top.
Community access, the playbook "Prove Your AI Skills", and your onboarding roadmap land the day you join, not the day the platform opens. The prep guide and the self-paced training platform follow, and on the full program your Live Bootcamp with Alex G is on the calendar.
Three weeks live with Alex Garrett-Smith, Technical Education Lead at BitterBrains and Examination Board Lead for this certification. It comes with the full program.
Six live sessions, two a week. About four hours live per week, plus roughly an hour a day between sessions. Every session recorded and yours to keep.
About 80% of it is hands-on, drill decks, sandbox labs, real codebases, trying the moves yourself under feedback until the judgment is actually yours.
It runs from the moment you buy until 30 days after the exam launches, not 30 days from purchase. Buying now, before the exam is live, carries no risk, and you decide after you've seen the real thing, not before.
Sitting an exam ends it. That's the rule we've always run, you can't take the exam and then ask for the money back.
To request a refund, email team@certificates.dev. A refund happens from a single message.
Every plan except the exam-only door includes a free retake, and the pass assurance makes it automatic. Sit the exam, miss, and your retake is already yours, no case to make.
Failing doesn't trigger the money-back guarantee, it triggers this instead, and it holds whether or not your refund window is still open. A miss is covered either way.
The score report you get is the study plan for the second attempt. The exam is designed to be passed by capable engineers who prepare.
No. Nothing shows on your profile, and there's no page anyone can look up to see that you sat the exam and didn't pass. The attempt is kept private so the bar can stay high.
3 years from your purchase date, the same as our other certifications. There's no rush, you can sit whenever you're ready inside that window.
Yes. A US sticker price isn't the same real cost everywhere.
If you're browsing from one of about 134 eligible countries, you'll see a regional pricing option on the pricing cards, applied by default across every plan. Turning it off reverts to the global rate for comparison.
The discount is tied to sitting the exam from that same eligible country, not just buying from it.
Yes. Seats can be added directly on the pricing cards and the price adjusts as your team grows, with volume rungs from 5 seats.
For a larger rollout, procurement requirements, or anything a toggle can't handle, email team@certificates.dev and we'll work it out with you directly.
During the preorder, the AI-Native certification costs the least it ever will. You get early access to the prep guide and the hands-on training as each piece ships so you come out a sharper engineer and walk into the exam ready. Pass it, and take your place among the first developers certified.
Not ready yet? Email me this page